Why is it that we value those who are like us and devalue those who are different?
Maybe it’s women or lesbians, maybe it’s aborigines or gays, maybe it’s drug addicts or prostitutes, or maybe it’s another culture. Is it that they don’t sound like us or eat the same food as us. Is it that they see the world differently? Is it that they value different things? Do we read the situation as one where they are criticising us? Is that why we have to circle the wagons?
Richard Rohr has some insights into the practice of excluding people.
The Sin of Exclusion
Those at the edge of any system and those excluded from any system ironically and invariably hold the secret for the conversion and wholeness of that very group. They always hold the feared, rejected, and denied parts of the group’s soul. You see, therefore, why the church was meant to be that group that constantly went to the edges, to the “least of the brothers and sisters,” and even to the enemy. Jesus was not just a theological genius, but he was also a psychological and sociological genius. When any church defines itself by exclusion of anybody, it is always wrong. It is avoiding its only vocation, which is to be the Christ. The only groups that Jesus seriously critiques are those who include themselves and exclude others from the always-given grace of God. (more)
- Rohr on outsiders… (thisfragiletent.com)
- Richard Rohr Re The Profane (literarylew.wordpress.com)
- [Thought] The Sin of Exclusion (davidhulonhood.typepad.com)
- The Power of Now – Thoughts from Richard Rohr (livingasapprentices.com)